Author:
González-Zapata Laura I,Alvarez-Dardet Carlos,Ortiz-Moncada Rocio,Clemente Vicente,Millstone Erik,Holdsworth Michelle,Sarri Katerina,Tarlao Giulio,Horvath Zoltanne,Lobstein Tim,Savva Savvas
Abstract
AbstractObjectiveTo explore policy options that public health specialists (PHS) consider appropriate for combating obesity in Europe, and compare their preferences with those of other stakeholders (non-PHS).DesignStructured interviews using multicriteria mapping, a computer-based, decision-support tool.SettingNine European countries.SubjectsA total of 189 stakeholders. Twenty-seven interviewees were PHS and non-PHS included food, sports and health sectors.MeasurementsA four-step approach was taken, i.e. selecting options, defining criteria, scoring options quantitatively and weighting the criteria to provide overall rankings of options. Interviews were recorded and transcribed to yield qualitative data.ResultsThe PHS concur with other stakeholders interviewed, as all emphasised the importance of educational initiatives in combating obesity, followed by policies to improve community sports facilities, introduce mandatory food labelling and controlling food and drink advertising. Further analyses revealed several significant differences. The non-PHS from the private sector ranked institutional reforms favourably; the PHS from non-Mediterranean countries supported the option of medicines to prevent obesity; and those PHS from Mediterranean countries endorsed the use of activity monitoring devices such as pedometers. As far as appraisal criteria were concerned, PHS considered efficacy and the economic impact on the public sector to be the most important.ConclusionThere is clear consensus among PHS and other stakeholders concerning the need for a package of policy options, which suggests that European-wide implementation could be successful. However, it would be advisable to avoid more contentious policy options such as taxation until future changes in public opinion.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Nutrition and Dietetics,Medicine (miscellaneous)
Reference36 articles.
1. 27. Comisión de las comunidades europeas. Libro verde (2005) Fomentar una alimentación sana y la actividad física: una dimensión europea para la prevención del exceso de peso, la obesidad y las enfermedades crónicas. http://ec.europa.eu/health/ph_determinants/life_style/nutrition/documents/nutrition_gp_es.pdf
2. What (not) to do about obesity: a moderate Aristotelian answer;Epstein;Georgetown Law J,2005
3. The Politics Of Obesity: Seven Steps To Government Action
4. 36. Lobstein T & Millstone E (2006) Policy Options for Responding to Obesity: Evaluating the Options, p. 19. Brighton: University of Sussex; available at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/spru/documents/porgrow_complete.pdf
5. Take 5, a nutrition education intervention to increase fruit and vegetable intakes: impact on attitudes towards dietary change;Anderson;Br J Nutr,1998
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献