Abstract
Abstract
I argue that there are two distinct approaches to understanding reduction: the ontology-first approach and the theory-first approach. They concern the relation between ontological reduction and inter-theoretic reduction. Further, I argue for the significance of this distinction by demonstrating that either one or the other approach has been taken as an implicit assumption in, and has in fact shaped, our understanding of what statistical mechanics is. More specifically, I argue that Boltzmannian statistical mechanics assumes and relies on the ontology-first approach, whereas Gibbsian statistical mechanics should assume the theory-first approach.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,Philosophy,History
Reference40 articles.
1. Boltzmann’s Approach to Statistical Mechanics
2. Why Gibbs Phase Averages Work—the Role of Ergodic Theory;Malament;Philosophy of Science,1980
3. Statistical Mechanics of Deep Learning;Bahri;Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics,2020
4. Statistical Mechanics: A Tale of Two Theories;Frigg;The Monist,2019
5. Maroney, Owen J. E. 2008. “The Physical Basis of the Gibbs-von Neumann Entropy.” https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0701127.