Poisoned Babies, Shot Fathers, and Ruined Experiments: Experimental Evidence in Favor of the Compositionality Constraint of Actual Causation

Abstract

AbstractLivengood and Sytsma (2020) challenge thecompositionality constraint of actual causation(CCAC), according to which each intermediary of a causal chain is an effect of its predecessor and a cause of its successor link. In several studies, they find support for their hypothesis that the CCAC is not in accordance with the ordinary causal attributions of laypeople. We argue that there are three interrelated problems in their studies’ design that we call thecausality-responsibility confusion(CRC), theintermediary-ontology confusion(IOC), and thecause-end questioning(CEQ). Avoiding the CRC, the IOC, and the CEQ leads to strong empirical support for the CCAC.