Abstract
AbstractThis article examines the critical reception of Feist's 2017 album Pleasure, and interpretations by reviewers of the mysterious hiss that permeates most of the album's tracks. I firstly contextualise Pleasure in relation to the aesthetics of record production. I then examine interviews with Feist and her collaborators to identify the source of the hiss, and explain its presence on Pleasure. Lastly, I examine a corpus of 20 reviews, showcasing how critics (mis)identified and (mis)interpreted the sound, as well as the effect of this on their overall understanding of the album. To explain the relationship between the hiss and accompanying music, I assume a semiotic perspective. Following Poyatos, I regard these two kinds of sound as part of distinct yet related cosystems of signs, loosely analogous to the relationship between verbal utterances and nonverbal behaviours in face-to-face communication. Through this lens, I analyse how Pleasure's hiss was heard to modify, support, emphasise and undermine the meaning of the music by reviewers.
Funder
Arts and Humanities Research Council
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference65 articles.
1. Beyond Unwanted Sound
2. Harper, A. 2014. ‘Lo-fi aesthetics in popular discourse’, PhD thesis (University of Oxford).
3. The Sound of Disaffection
4. Driscoll, A. 2017. ‘Feist – Pleasure’, review of Pleasure by Feist for Raw Meat, 28 April. https://web.archive.org/web/20220228194116/https%3A%2F%2Fwww.wearerawmeat.com%2Fposts%2Ffeist-pleasure (accessed 6 February 2023)
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献