Abstract
In this article the development of Germankönnen, dürfen, sollen, mögen, müssen, andwollenis examined in the light of grammaticalization theory. It is assumed that these verbs form a class (or subclass) of modal auxiliaries. Some of the assertions made on the development of modal verbs across languages are examined. For example, do the modal meanings develop from nonmodal meanings? Do the epistemic uses of these auxiliaries evolve from deontic ones? Can such an evolution be described in terms of metaphor and can the development of these verbs be described as following a distinct “path” that is “unidirectional”? Some of these questions are answered in the affirmative, but new question arise in the course of the investigation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Index;Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax;2019-10-10
2. References;Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax;2019-10-10
3. American English: No Written Standard before the Twentieth Century?;Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax;2019-10-10
4. Possessives World-Wide: Genitive Variation in Varieties of English;Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax;2019-10-10
5. Modelling Step Change: The History ofWill-Verbs in Germanic;Categories, Constructions, and Change in English Syntax;2019-10-10