Abstract
AbstractThink tanks in competitive authoritarian regimes are implicitly if not explicitly oppositional, producing and disseminating research critical of government policies and elite behaviour. Existing literature asks how and why such think tanks emerge and survive, and if they exercise real influence. This paper asks if anyone actually reads their critical research. Focusing on two cases in Mozambique – theInstituto de Estudos Sociais e Económicos(IESE) and theCentro de Integridade Pública(CIP) – three original data sets are examined: (1) citations in the bibliographies of end-of-programme theses of undergraduates in the political science, public administration, economics, and/or sociology departments of two of Mozambique's most important universities; (2) websites and Facebook activities – visits, downloads, etc.; and (3) citations in academic journals that publish on Africa. Findings show evolving demand for these think tanks’ research, suggesting their growing status within Mozambique and, by implication, within civil societies of similar competitive authoritarian regimes.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference86 articles.
1. Youngs R. 2001. ‘Democracy promotion: the case of European Union strategy.’ Center for European Policy Studies, Working Document No. 167.
2. Think Tanks and Civil Societies Program, University of Pennsylvania. n.d. ‘Global go to think tank index reports.’ , accessed 21.12.2017.
3. Politics after the Time of Hunger in Mozambique: A Critique of Neo-Patrimonial Interpretation of African Elites
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献