Abstract
ABSTRACTThe efforts of American activists to pressure Asian corporations in Sudan have to date resembled a struggle to find the light switch in the dark, or swimming against a strong current. While the impact of the divestment campaign in the United States has been increasingly evident, its effectiveness in producing actual results in Sudan remains suspect. Thanks to China and a trio of Asian national oil companies, oil still flows in Sudan. The campaign's activities have failed to incorporate Sudan's wider international political and economic relations into its strategy. It has rather paradoxically sought to pressure state-owned corporations through financial market divestment. The nature of its Asian targets, reluctant Western investors and a distracted American government have obstructed the campaign from having a resounding impact in Sudan.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Geography, Planning and Development
Reference46 articles.
1. Sudan Tribune . 2008. ‘Chinese special envoy meets Darfur rebels’, 28.2.2008, http://www.sudantribune.com/spip.php?article31317, accessed 29.5.2009.
2. Disinvestment by Multinational Corporations
3. The Humanitarian Carnival: A Celebrity Vogue
4. Mitchell J. & Lahn G. . 2007. ‘Oil for Asia’, briefing paper. London: Chatham House.
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献