Abstract
ABSTRACTArchaeologists have an obligation to conduct research that is relevant and responsive to the desires, interests, values, and concerns of Indigenous descendant communities. Current best practices for collaborative, community-based archaeologies emphasize long-term engagement and “full collaboration,” including the coproduction of knowledge and total stakeholder involvement. The present-day structures and demands of archaeology—especially in CRM and graduate student research contexts—can serve to make such fully collaborative work difficult, if not impossible. Oftentimes, these difficulties result in a complete abdication of collaboration or even consultation beyond the bare minimum required by law. However, professional archaeologists must strive in all instances to work alongside Native communities in respectful, responsive, and mutually beneficial ways even if this work may often fall short of the loftiest ideal. In this article, the authors present two case studies in collaboration from recent projects conducted in the North American midcontinent. These case studies clearly demonstrate how tribal fieldwork monitoring, working with tribal institutional review boards (IRBs), and other related forms of “imperfect” collaboration can still help move us toward a more ethical, inclusive, and respectful future archaeology.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference34 articles.
1. USA.gov. 2022. Federally Recognized Indian Tribes. Electronic document, https://www.usa.gov/tribes, accessed November 4, 2022.
2. Meier, Christian . 2020. Indigenous Involvement in the Heritage Resource Management Industry in Southern Ontario: Conversations with Three Nations . Master's thesis, Department of Anthropology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
3. Control of Indigenous Archaeological Heritage in Ontario, Canada
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Archaeology as Service;Advances in Archaeological Practice;2023-08