Abstract
AbstractIt is natural to think that social groups are concrete material particulars, but this view faces an important objection. Suppose the chess club and nature club have the same members. Intuitively, these are different clubs even though they have a common material basis. Some philosophers take these intuitions to show that the materialist view must be abandoned. I propose an alternative explanation. Social groups are concrete material particulars, but there is a psychological explanation of nonidentity intuitions. Social groups appear coincident but nonidentical because they are perceived to be governed by conflicting social norms.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference78 articles.
1. The metaphysics of groups
2. Propositions as Truthmaker Conditions;Jago;Argumenta,2017
3. Persons and Bodies: How to Avoid the New Dualism;Burke;American Philosophical Quarterly,1997
4. Groups, II
5. The Supreme Court and the Supreme Court Justices: A Metaphysical Puzzle
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. People and places;Noûs;2024-04-09