Abstract
AbstractThis article describes some of the challenges raised by multinational operations for the application of international humanitarian law. Such challenges are the result of different levels of ratification of treaties, divergent interpretations of shared obligations, and the fact that there is no central authority that determines who is a party to an armed conflict. The article discusses methods that have been developed to ensure ‘legal interoperability’. Some of these methods attempt to avoid situations where such interoperability is required. Where this is not possible, a ‘maximalist’ or a ‘minimalist’ approach can be taken, and in practice these are usually combined.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference30 articles.
1. Judicial lawmaking at the ad hoc tribunals: the creative use of the sources of international law and “adventurous interpretation”;Swart;Zeitschrift für Ausländisches Öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht,2010
2. The Advisory Opinion: The Light Treatment of International Humanitarian Law
3. A dangerous guessing game disguised as an enlightened policy: United States laws of war obligations during military operations other than war;Bullman;Military Law Review,1999
Cited by
26 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献