Abstract
AbstractThis article examines whether and how non-State armed groups, as distinct entities, might be required to provide reparations for their violations of international humanitarian law. It shows that the possibility of holding armed groups to reparations is marked by uncertainty in international law. This complex question calls for clarification. In building on these observations, the article explores how the duty to provide reparations by armed groups could be operationalized as a matter of lex ferenda. This exercise involves examining how such a duty could be conceptualized and put into practice. From this discussion, a multi-faceted proposal emerges, which draws upon existing approaches in international law and responds to the particular challenges presented by armed groups. The article ends by considering the implications of the proposal.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference17 articles.
1. Organized violence, 1989–2018 and peace agreements
2. Reparative Justice – Focus on Victims;van Boven;Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights,2007
3. The International Responsibility of Non-State Armed Groups: In Search of the Applicable Rules;Heffes;Goettingen Journal of International Law,2017
4. Taking Armed Groups Seriously: Ways to Improve their Compliance with International Humanitarian Law
5. International law: armed groups in a state-centric system
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献