Abstract
AbstractStates must investigate possible violations of international humanitarian law in armed conflict, and many States use military procedures for all or part of the investigation process. Particular tensions can arise with regard to the perception of justice in the context of military judicial procedures, especially surrounding questions of independence and impartiality. This article lays out the international legal framework which should be used to solve these challenges, arguing that a State must address both the specificities of military institutions and the need for a perception of justice by the affected communities in considering the proper administration of justice in armed conflict.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Sociology and Political Science
Reference15 articles.
1. The Right to Truth as an Autonomous Right under the Inter-American Human Rights System;Mac-Gregor;Mexican Law Review,2016
2. Network exposure and excessive use of force
3. THE ELUSIVE RIGHT TO TRUTH IN TRANSITIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS JURISPRUDENCE
4. Prolegomena to a Theory of Judicial Power: The Concept of Judicial Independence in Theory and History;Pasquino;Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals,2014
5. The Legalization of Truth in International Fact-Finding;Krebs;Chicago Journal of International Law,2017
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献