Abstract
Toleration is a Victorian subject, a monument to Victorian liberalism. ‘To us who have been educated in the nineteenth century’, proclaimed F. A. Inderwick in his book on the Interregnum, ‘any declaration inconsistent with religious toleration would be abhorrent and inadmissible’. His sentiment would not have seemed controversial to a generation raised on such best-selling works as Buckle’s History of Civilisation in England and Lecky’s History of the Rise and Influence of the Spirit of Rationalism. It may be that the Victorians, enquiring into the origins of the toleration which they had achieved, were prone to congratulate the past on becoming more like the present. Yet in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, when interest in the subject was perhaps at its peak, we can also detect, in the statements on toleration of a Creighton or a Figgis, a fear that the present might become more like the past: that materialism and religious indifference might destroy the moral foundations of toleration, and foster a new barbarism which would persecute Christians afresh.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Religious studies,History
Reference29 articles.
1. Blencowe R. W. ed, Diary of… Henry Sidney (2 vols 1834) pp 114–6.
2. Katz David S. , Philo-Semitism and the Readmission of the Jews to England 1603–1655 (Oxford 1982) esp p 224.
3. Figgis J. N. , ‘Toleration’, in Ollard S. L. and Cross G. eds A Dictionary of English Church History (1912) p 600.
4. Baxter Richard , The Quaker’s Catechism (1655) preface
5. Worden [Blair] , The Rump Parliament [1648-1653 (Cambridge 1974)] p 214.
Cited by
41 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献