Abstract
While in recent years there has been a slow accumulation of research exploring the links between Robert Louis Stevenson's work and capitalism, there remains a sense that this is still only an interesting byway when reading him, rather than a central route. Partly, this can be explained by this research having tended to focus on individual texts attached to specialised or circumscribed contemporary frames – the gold versus silver standard debate, for instance, or Victorian economic theory. As revealing as these localised contextualisations are, their connection to the rest of Stevenson's oeuvre, and to the wider operation of late Victorian capitalism, can be somewhat opaque. More broadly, the neglect of this aspect of Stevenson's work can be seen as the continuing legacy of his status as writer and theorist of romance, a fictional mode still often associated with a childish escapism and reactionary politics – despite recent work by Julia Reid and Glenda Norquay showing how Stevenson must be distinguished from fellow romance revivalists such as H. Rider Haggard, Andrew Lang, and G. A. Henty, to whom such epithets more properly apply.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Literature and Literary Theory,Cultural Studies
Reference66 articles.
1. Stevenson Robert Louis . “The Paris Bourse.” London: a Conservative Weekly Journal of Politics, Finance, Society, and the Arts. 24 Feb 1887: 88.
2. Lay Morals;Stevenson;Osbourne and Van de Grift
3. Stevenson Robert Louis . “My First Book: Treasure Island.” 1894. Ed. Jerome K. Jerome. 297–309.
4. Stevenson's Revisions of Treasure Island: ‘Writing Down the Whole Particulars.’;Mann;Text: Transactions of the Society for Textual Scholarship,1987