Abstract
AbstractMisidentified fossils are common in paleontology, but Platylithophycus has undergone a particularly problematic series of descriptions. The holotype of P. cretaceus comes from the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Chalk of Kansas, and was first described as a calcareous green alga, based on the surface texture of the specimen. Later, Platylithophycus was re-identified as a sepiid cephalopod, based partly on a comparison of microstructure between P. cretaceus and the pen of modern squids. Platylithophycus then became part of the University of Nebraska teaching collection, where, according to paleontological legend, an undergraduate student suggested that the fossil’s tessellated surface looked a lot like shark cartilage. However, that interpretation has not been formally proposed until now. This work re-describes the holotype of Platylithophycus cretaceus as part of the branchial endoskeleton of an elasmobranch, based on both gross morphology and ultrastructure, including recognizable tessellated cartilage with intertesseral pores and joints.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference34 articles.
1. Mollusca, in Grundzüge der Palaeontologie (Palaeozoologie);Zittel;München, Leipzig, Verlag von Oldenburg,1895
2. The use of acetic acid in the development of vertebrate fossils;Toombs;Museum Journal, London,1948
3. Enterospirae (fossil intestines) from the Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Formation of Western Kansas: University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions;Stewart;Fossil Fish Studies,1978
4. Skeletal and dental anatomy of lamniform shark,Cretalamna appendiculata, from Upper Cretaceous Niobrara Chalk of Kansas
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献