Ideology and Unstable Party Identification in Canada: Limited Rationality in a Brokerage Party System

Author:

Stevenson H. Michael

Abstract

AbstractThis article examines changes in individuals' identification with Canadian federal political parties in the period 1977 to 1981. The analysis suggests that differences in class and ideology have a significant, if not very large effect on shifts in partisan identity. There was a slight bias toward more upper-class identification with the Progressive Conservative party and more lower-class identification with the Liberal party. Unstable partisans were at least as ideologically constrained as stable partisans, and partisan instability was more pronounced amongst the more left-wing individuals. Changes in partisanship were more likely among younger respondents, particularly lower-class and more left-wing youth. The largest bloc of unstable partisans was closest ideologically to the more left-wing stable New Democratic party partisans, and shifted only between the New Democratic and Liberal parties. A smaller bloc moved to the Progressive Conservative party and was ideologically closest to its more right-wing stable partisans.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Sociology and Political Science

Reference42 articles.

1. Partisan Instability in Canada: Evidence from a New Panel Study

2. “Comment: The Filling of Wine Bottles is Not Easy,”;Jenson;JOURNAL,1978

3. “Region, Class and Political Culture in Canada,”;Ornstein;JOURNAL,1980

Cited by 11 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Elite Influence on Public Opinion in an Informed Electorate;American Political Science Review;2011-08

2. Political Ideology and Economic Freedom Across Canadian Provinces;Eastern Economic Journal;2011-03-21

3. Political Ideology and Economic Freedom Across Canadian Provinces;SSRN Electronic Journal;2009

4. Can Canadians Take a Hint? The (In)Effectiveness of Party Labels as Information Shortcuts in Canada;Canadian Journal of Political Science;2008-09

5. ‘Different’ but not ‘exceptional’: Canada's permeable fordism;Canadian Review of Sociology/Revue canadienne de sociologie;2008-07-14

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3