Abstract
Economic analyses of nature must somehow define the “environmental commodities” to which values are attached. We articulate principles to guide the choice and interpretation of nonmarket commodities. We describe how complex natural systems can be decomposed consistent with “ecological production theory,” which, like conventional production theory, distinguishes between biophysical inputs, process, and outputs. We argue that a systems approach to the decomposition and presentation of natural commodities can inform and possibly improve the validity of nonmarket environmental valuation studies. We raise concerns about interpretation, usefulness, and accuracy of benefit estimates derived without reference to ecological production theory.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference117 articles.
1. Information Bias in Contingent Valuation: Effects of Personal Relevance, Quality of Information, and Motivational Orientation
2. Damery D.T. , and Allen P.G. 2004. “An Economic Valuation of Recreational Shellfishing on Cape Cod.” Resource Economics Working Paper 2004-10, University of Massachusetts. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=615582.
3. Wetlands, for example, have been found to increase the value of homes in urban areas (Mahan, Polasky, and Adams 2000) but lower them in rural areas (Bin and Polasky 2005).
Cited by
44 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献