Abstract
Abstract
Objective
Telephone availability is integrated into our home-based palliative care team (HPCT) with the aim of helping terminally ill patients and their caregivers alleviate their physical and psychosocial suffering, in addition to the team's home visits. We aimed to compare the differences between non-callers (patients with no phone calls during the team's follow-up period) vs. callers (≥1 phone call during the team's follow-up period) across sociodemographic, clinical, physical, and psychosocial variables.
Method
Retrospective analysis of all patients with and without phone call entries registered in our anonymized database, from October 2018 to September 2020.
Results
We analyzed 389 patients: 58% were male, and the average age was 71 years old; 84% had malignancies, with a mean palliative performance status of 45%. The majority of patients (n = 281, 72%) made at least one phone call to HPCT. On average, a mean of 2.5 calls (SD = 3.61; range: 0–26) per patient was registered. Callers compared with non-callers more frequently lived with someone (p = 0.030), preferred home as a place to die (p = 0.039), had more doctor (p = 0.010) and nurse home visits (p = 0.006), a prolonged HPCT follow-up time (p = 0.053), along with more frequent emergency room visits (p < 0.001) and hospitalizations (p = 0.043). Moreover, those who made at least one phone call to the HPCT had a higher frequency of conspiracy of silence (p = 0.046), anxiety (p = 0.044), and lower palliative performance status (p = 0.001). No statistically significant associations or differences were found for the other variables.
Significance of results
Several factors seem to correlate with an increased number of phone calls, and physical suffering does not play a relevant role in triggering contacts, in contrast with psychosocial and other clinical factors.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Psychiatry and Mental health,Clinical Psychology,General Medicine,General Nursing
Reference20 articles.
1. Patient and carer preference for, and satisfaction with, specialist models of palliative care: a systematic literature review
2. Eliciting Personhood Within Clinical Practice: Effects on Patients, Families, and Health Care Providers
3. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of home palliative care services for adults with advanced illness and their caregivers;Gomes;Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews,2013
4. The Edmonton Symptom Assessment System 25 Years Later: Past, Present, and Future Developments
5. Palliative Care Needs Assessment Guidance [Internet] (2014) Place of publication: The National Clinical Programme for Palliative Care, HSE Clinical Strategy and Programmes Division [revised January 2016; cited May 2020]; [13 pages]. Available at: www.hse.ie/palliativecareprogramme.