Dying at home: What is needed? Findings from a nationwide retrospective cross-sectional online survey of bereaved people in Germany

Author:

Kasdorf AlinaORCID,Voltz Raymond,Strupp JuliaORCID

Abstract

Abstract Objectives According to the “Last Year of Life in Cologne” study, 68% of patients with a serious and terminal illness wanted to die at home, but 42% died in hospital. Only 1 in 5 died at home. Most people want to spend their last days and hours at home, but the reality is that this is not always possible. Recommendations are needed on how best to support families to enable people to die at home – if this is their preferred place of death. Our aim was to identify the factors that make it possible for people to die at home and to analyze factors of dying at home. Methods Germany-wide quantitative cross-sectional online survey of bereaved adult relatives. Results The needs of 320 relatives of patients who wished to die at home were explored. Of these, 198 patients died at home and 122 did not. In the last 3 months of life, caregivers needed support in managing out-of-hours care (p < 0.001), financing (p = 0.012), preparing and organizing home care (both p < 0.001), communicating with the patient and medical staff (p = 0.012 and p = 0.009, respectively), and pain management (p < 0.001). Relatives whose next of kin did not die at home had higher needs, suggesting that these factors are key to home care of the dying. Significance of results The process of dying at home begins long before the actual dying phase. To minimize caregiver burden and improve symptom management, advanced home care plans are needed, with ongoing reassessment of family preferences and abilities.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Reference29 articles.

1. Last Aid Course. An education for all citizens and an ingredient of compassionate communities;Bollig;Healthcare (Basel),2019

2. Domröse, L and Lichte, T (2018) DEGAM Leilinie Pflegende Angehörige. https://www.degam.de/files/Inhalte/Leitlinien-Inhalte/Dokumente/DEGAM-S3-Leitlinien/053-006_Pflegende%20Angehoerige/oeffentlich/053-006_Patinfo_DEGAM%20LL%20Pflegende%20Angeh%C3%B6rige_A4_4-3-2019.pdf (accessed 18 March 2024).

3. Improving the quality of Web surveys: The Checklist for Reporting Results of Internet E-Surveys (CHERRIES);Eysenbach;Journal of Medical Internet Research,2004

4. Actual and preferred place of death of home-dwelling patients in four European countries: Making sense of quality indicators;de Roo;PLoS One,2014

5. Congruence between preferred and actual place of death according to the presence of malignant or non-malignant disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis;Billingham;BMJ Supportive and Palliative Care,2013

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3