Abstract
This Article explores Microfinance and microcredit (“MFI”) programs from several perspectives, with particular emphasis on human rights issues. These programs involve making small loans to people who would otherwise be unable to borrow money to facilitate them starting their own businesses: frequently, the programs focus on women borrowers in developing countries. The emphasis of MFI programs on women in developing countries makes it important to consider these programs in terms of both women's and indigenous rights, while MFI as an approach to poverty merits a discussion of economic rights. Part I of the article will explore the concept and scope of current MFI programs, describing key components of these programs and assessing comments from both fans and critics. The Grameen Bank, which has been studied extensively and has acted as a model for several other programs, will be examined in detail. Part II of this Article considers MFI in the context of human rights considerations, including economic, indigenous, and women's rights. One particular aspect of Grameen's program, namely the use of Sixteen Decisions, is also critiqued, applying organizational behavior theory. Part III will compare MFI with other approaches to poverty, inclu property rights initiatives, women's cooperatives and social enterprise approaches.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference222 articles.
1. Id. at 122, poem by David Whyte, from The House of Belonging, in Alan Rugman, The End of Globalization 1 (2000) at 88.
2. Kenneth Anderson, Microcredit: Fulfilling or Belying the Universalist Morality of Globalizing Markets? 5 Yale H.R. & Dev. L.J. 85 (2002)
3. See http://www.nesst.org/documents/NESsTUniqueandUniversal-paperMay2003.pdf.
4. NESsT website at http://www.nesst.org/.
5. Id. at 236.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Community-Based Interventions;Challenges in Health and Development;2017
2. Chapter 4;Challenges in Health and Development;2010-11-25
3. Current Awareness;Legal Information Management;2010-03