Author:
Choe So Young,Min Kyung-Hwan
Abstract
AbstractRecent research has emphasized emotion’s role in non-utilitarian judgments, but has not focused much on characteristics of subjects contributing to those judgments. The present article relates utilitarian judgment to individual disposition to experience various emotions. Study 1 first investigated the relationship among state emotions and utilitarian judgment. Diverse emotions were elicited during judgment: guilt, sadness, disgust, empathy, anger, and anxiety, etc. Using psychological scales, Study 2 found that trait emotions predict the extent of utilitarian judgments, especially trait anger, trait disgust, and trait empathy. Unlike previous research that designated emotions only as factors mitigating utilitarian judgment, this research shows that trait anger correlates positively with utilitarian judgment. On the other hand, disgust and empathy correlated negatively. Guilt and shame—though previous research argued that their absence increased utilitarian judgment—appear unrelated to the extent of utilitarian judgment. These results suggest that people’s emotional dispositions can affect their judgment. This finding might contribute to untangling the complex mechanisms of utilitarian judgments.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Applied Psychology,General Decision Sciences
Reference31 articles.
1. Nam, K. (2008). Influences of shame and guilt experiences and coping on psychological symptoms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Seoul National University.
2. Spielberger, C. D. , Jacobs, G. , Russel, S. , & Crane, R. (1983). Assessment of Anger: The State-Trait Anger Scale
3. How (and where) does moral judgment work?
4. Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors
5. Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献