Public Reporting of Performance Indicators in Long-Term Care in Canada: Does it Make a Difference?

Author:

Poldrugovac MirchaORCID,Amuah Joseph Emmanuel,Wei-Randall Helen,Sidhom Patricia,Morris Kathleen,Allin Sara,Klazinga Niek,Kringos Dionne

Abstract

AbstractEvidence of the impact of public reporting of health care performance on quality improvement is not yet sufficient for definitive conclusions to be drawn, despite the important policy implications. This study explored the association of public reporting of performance indicators of long-term care facilities in Canada with performance trends. We considered 16 performance indicators in long-term care in Canada, 8 of which are publicly reported at a facility level, whereas the other 8 are not publicly reported, between the fiscal years 2011–2012 and 2018–2019. Data from 1,087 long-term care facilities were included. Improving trends were observed among publicly reported indicators more often than among indicators that were not publicly reported. Our analysis also suggests that the association between publication of data and improvement is stronger among indicators for which there was no improvement prior to publication and among the worst performing facilities.

Funder

H2020 Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Geriatrics and Gerontology,Community and Home Care,Gerontology,Health (social science)

Reference54 articles.

1. Designing Difference in Difference Studies: Best Practices for Public Health Policy Research

2. An evaluation of data quality in Canada’s Continuing Care Reporting System (CCRS): secondary analyses of Ontario data submitted between 1996 and 2011

3. BC Care Providers Association. (2018). A Pathway to Ensuring the Appropriate Use of Antipsychotics in Continuing Care: Sharing Success Stories from BCCPA Members. BC Care Providers Association. Retrieved 6 May 2020 from https://bccare.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/BCCPA-Antipsychotics-Guide-2018.pdf

4. The impact of Public Reporting on clinical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

5. Canadian Institute for Health Information. (2013). CCRS quality indicators risk adjustment methodology. Canadian Institute for Health Information. Retrieved 7 May 2020 from https://www.cihi.ca/sites/default/files/document/ccrs_qi_risk_adj_meth_2013_en_0.pdf

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3