Abstract
AbstractThis article investigates Classic Maya understandings of two particular animal species: the (gray) fox and the armadillo. We use these species as a point of entry into Classic Maya categorizations of the non-human animal world, examining the salient biological and physical characteristics of those animals that Classic-period artists and scribes chose to highlight. Rather than accepting the creatures depicted on painted pottery or referenced in hieroglyphic texts as generalized examples of particular kinds (i.e., simply “a fox” or “an armadillo”), however, we show how the evidence from ancient art, historical accounts, and contemporary ethnography points to an emphasis onspecificbeings, often named individuals, who engage in particular behaviors and relate to other entities (both human and non-human) in distinctive ways. Although this article focuses exclusively on the fox and the armadillo, those species serve as examples through which we consider the limitations of applying Western taxonomic categories to other systems of knowledge, as well as the possibilities for how we might catch glimpses of radically different ways of organizing the world.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Geography, Planning and Development
Reference115 articles.
1. National Wildlife Federation 2020 Nine-Banded Armadillo. Electronic document, https://www.nwf.org/Educational-Resources/Wildlife-Guide/Mammals/Nine-Banded-Armadillo, accessed December 30, 2020.
2. Great Tzotzil Dictionary of San Lorenzo Zinacantán
3. Carmina Archilochi;Davenport;Arion: A Journal of Humanities and the Classics,1963
4. Ontologies, anthropologists, and ethical lifeLloyd, G. E. R. 2012.Being, humanity, and understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press