Abstract
Significant indirect evidence suggests that one of the Classic-period residential groups at Tikal was the residence of a family of potters who produced high-quality painted wares. Delineation of the borders of residential Group 4H-1 at Tikal led me to postulate that thebajowas a major resource zone for ceramic manufacturing rather than a spatially limiting feature. This family of upscale ceramic producers used the adjacentbajoas a source of clay and fuel for firing pottery. The configuration of other groups near Group 4H-1 suggests not only that the people occupying the several groups on this peninsula were related, but that they were all involved in the production, painting, and distribution of fine ceramics. These several residential groups, located on adjacent house lots, define abarriowithin Tikal whose occupants formed an extended kin unit sharing an economic focus on the production of high-quality ceramics. A consideration of the contents of trash deposits that were used by the Maya for building fill and a study of the middens found adjacent to residential groups at Tikal provide clues to the location of a specific kiln, or firing area. Broken pottery in the structure fill tells us more than architectural history. In this example, pottery indicates how other aspects of one or more house lots were organized and used. In particular, these data suggest that abarrio-like cluster of households at Tikal, with its own ritual center (Group 5G-I), housed families of ceramic producers who had specifically located their residences in direct proximity to thebajo. The search for the firing facilities associated with the production of ceramics in Group 4H-1 is now a major research focus. “Kilns,” or firing facilities, should be among the various architectural features found “out back,” or located on the margins of a house lot. Kilns may have been of the trench type or free-standing small buildings, possibly within sheds, and are expected outside the perimeter formed by the main buildings of the residential group. The structures facing a plaza or series of plazas that are the most obvious elements of a single household tend to attract archaeological attention. Location of structures “out back,” or peripheral to the residential core buildings, could help define the configuration of household lots.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Arts and Humanities (miscellaneous),Geography, Planning and Development
Reference133 articles.
1. Wells, E. Christian 2000 Pottery Production and Microcosmic Organization: The ResidentialStructure of La Quemada, Zacatecas.Latin American Antiquity 11:21–42.
2. Urban, Patricia A. , Benjamin P. Carter , E. Christian Wells , and Marne T. Ausec 2001 Comments on “The Power and Ideology of ArtisticCreation,” by Takeshi Inomata.Current Anthropology 42(3):321–349.
3. Wauchope, Robert 1934 House Mounds of Uaxactun, Guatemala.Carnegie Institution Publication No. 436. Contributions to AmericanArchaeology, vol. 2, no. 7.Carnegie Institution of Washington,Washington, DC.
4. Wells, E. Christian 1996 A Preliminary Assessment of the Organization of Ceramic Production atLa Sierra, Honduras: Evidence from the South Group.Senior honors thesis,Department of Archaeological Studies, Oberlin College,Oberlin, OH.
5. Vitelli, Karen D. 1997 Inferring Firing Procedures from Sherds: Early Greek Kilns. InThe Prehistory and History of Ceramic Kilns, edited by Prudence M. Rice , pp.21–40.Ceramics and Civilization Vol. VII.American Ceramics Society,Westerville, OH.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献