Abstract
Since the early 1980s, the eighteenth-century beginnings of German
mass
migration to North America have been the subject of intense research and
writing. In spite of the multifaceted results of this research on both
sides
of the ocean, the textbook explanation of early German Atlantic migration
has demonstrated a striking persistence. To quote from one of the best
English-language textbooks on German social history, ‘from about
1750
on, over-population fuelled…the beginnings of the exodus to North
America’. This interpretation is exactly where scholars such as Wolfgang
von Hippel stood more than a decade ago, and it dovetails with the
migration theories of German population sociology of the 1970s. But is
it right? And what alternative explanations are available? The most
important alternative to the received approach is offered by the concept
of
networks. As Charles Tilly put it, ‘categories stay put, networks
move’.
If emigrants moved along lines of contacts and information, we do not
need to refer to strong push or pull factors in order to explain why they
were ‘uprooted’ from the territorial categories to which they
belonged.
Chain migration can be interpreted as a self-generating and self-sustaining
process, a system in itself. In this perspective, migration becomes more
and more likely because of flows of information, credit or capital between
the areas involved in migration – contacts created by migration cause
additional migration.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
General Social Sciences,History
Cited by
7 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献