Abstract
Abstract
When designing programs to assist the poor, it is important to recognize who is most in need of government assistance. Although measures of poverty are often based on income alone, poverty measures based on both income and assets provide greater precision in the analysis of this group since accumulated assets can be liquidated to compensate for temporary shortfalls in income. The current study used the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (2007–2017) to analyze associations between different facets of poverty dynamics (i.e. poverty entry and exit) and its determinants. We explored differences in results based on whether poverty was measured by income alone, or income plus assets. The Cox proportional hazard regression was used to examine how demographic characteristics predicted poverty entry and poverty exit. Results indicated factors predicting poverty entry were not identical to those predicting difficulty of exiting poverty. Also, the risk of poverty entry and exit differed based on whether poverty was measured by income alone, or income plus assets. Thus, using income plus assets provides new perspectives into poverty dynamics which past research, based on income alone, did not provide. These new insights can be used to inform decisions about policies for poverty prevention and alleviation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference42 articles.
1. Slipping Into And Out Of Poverty: The Dynamics Of Spells;Bane;Journal Of Human Resources,1986
2. The concept and measurement of asset poverty: Levels, trends and composition for the U.S., 1983?2001
3. Hokayem, C. and Heggeness, M. (2014), Factors Influencing Transitions Into and Out of Near Poverty: 2004-2012, SEHSD Working Paper 2014-05, U.S. Census Bureau, Washington DC.
4. Events that Trigger Poverty Entries and Exits*
5. Marrying, Unmarrying, and Poverty Dynamics among Mothers with Children Living at Home