Abstract
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic presents a unique opportunity to study how humans allocate scarce resources in times of hardship. We study public preferences regarding who should get access to government aid for the self-employed, a bed in the intensive care unit, and permission to cross the border using original conjoint survey experiments administered to an incentivised online panel in Switzerland during the first and second waves of the pandemic in 2020. We find that across the three areas, even in extraordinary circumstances such as the COVID-19 pandemic, evaluations of deservingness to aid and support are still based on an underlying logic of conditional solidarity and identity: in all experiments, contributing to the community, be it through past actions and contributions or through current efforts, plays a crucial role in determining an individual’s deservingness, as does their nationality (and legal status) with nationals being perceived as more deserving than non-nationals.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
Reference51 articles.
1. ‘The inevitable deservingness gap: A study into the insurmountable immigrant penalty in perceived welfare deservingness’;Reeskens;Journal of European Social Policy,2019
2. ‘Allocation of transplantable organs: Do people want to punish patients for causing their illness?;Ubel;Liver Transplantation,2001
3. ‘Is equality passé? Homo reciprocans and the future of egalitarian politics;Bowles;Boston Review,1998
4. ‘Evolutionary Political Psychology: On the Origin and Structure of Heuristics and Biases in Politics: Evolutionary Political Psychology’;Petersen;Political Psychology,2015
5. ‘Designing Multi-Factorial Survey Experiments: Effects of Presentation Style (Text or Table), Answering Scales, and Vignette Order;Sauer;Methods, Data, Analyses,2020
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献