Abstract
Higher propety taxes and uncertainty about post-easement tax levels may create a disincentive for landowners to participate in federal easement programs such as the Wetlands Reserve Program, and thus may distort participation levels in a manner inconsistent with the environmental benefits associated with individual parcels. Support for this hypothesis is provided in an exploratory analysis of state level participation in the Wetlands Reserve Program. If such distortions prove to be policy relevant, then either they should be accounted for in the bid acceptance process of future federal easement programs, or individual states and localities should correct property tax differentials and post-easement tax uncertainty.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Agronomy and Crop Science
Reference41 articles.
1. Swenson R. 1997. “Remarks on Cooperation between Federal Agencies and Cornell Cooperative Extension.” Presentation to the Cornell Cooperative Extension Forum, Dec. 1.
2. Land Retirement as a Tool for Reducing Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution
3. New York State Soil and Conservation Services. 1992. “Funds Available to Restore Farmed Wetlands.” News release. June 2.
4. Iowa State University Extension. 1992. Extension Wetlands Reserve Program: Restoring America's Wetlands Heritage. Pamphlet.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献