Abstract
AbstractSituated within the larger context of Canadian pipeline decisions, it is argued that pipeline proposals in a geography without pre-existing pipelines are unsuccessful in contrast to proposals repurposing and expanding existing pipelines. The Chippewas of the Thames (the ‘Chippewas’) unsuccessfully opposed Enbridge's expansion, reversal and repurposing to crude oil of the Line 9 pipeline in Ontario, Canada. Analysing the Chippewas’ case within the context of recent oil- and gas-pipeline developments, using a lens of intersectionality focused on identity markers of indigeneity, socio-economic status and geographical location, exposes the naturalised power structures of Canadian law. These structures include the legal institutions of real-property law, Crown ownership of wildlife and fish, implicit ‘standing’ of the economy and assimilation of indigenous rights. Exposing this dichotomy of indigenous rights on paper vs. in practice deepens the consideration of indigenous rights, potentially allowing intersecting oppressions to be addressed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference43 articles.
1. Intersectionality from Theoretical Framework to Policy Intervention
2. MOVEMENT INTERSECTIONALITY
3. Morgan, G (2017) Petronas pulls the plug on Canada's Pacific Northwest LNG megaproject. Financial Post. Available at https://business.financialpost.com/commodities/energy/newsalert-pacific-northwest-lng-megaproject-not-going-ahead-2 (accessed 19 March 2020).
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献