Abstract
AbstractReflecting the international experience, statistics show that most medical negligence cases in Ireland settle. Less is known, however, about the duration of these cases, though anecdotal evidence suggests that they are protracted in nature. Procedurally focused reforms, aimed at reducing costs and facilitating more expedient resolution of these disputes have been proposed in Ireland, yet await implementation. As such, the pace of litigation is largely determined by the parties to the dispute. Drawing on the findings of an empirical study (an analysis of closed case files and qualitative interviews), this article explores two questions: first, how long do medical negligence cases take to resolve; and secondly, what contributes to delay in this context. Whilst causes of delay may vary by case, it is important to attempt to identify and explore common factors which contribute to delay. If these factors can be problematised and understood, possible solutions may be reached. In doing so, the article contributes to the debate on medical negligence reform across common law jurisdictions, evidencing the broader considerations, in addition to procedurally focused reforms, which are required when considering the issue of delay.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference51 articles.
1. Toward a Conceptual Framework for Mixed-Method Evaluation Designs
2. Is the tail wagging the dog? Finding a place for ADR in pre-action processes: Practice and perception;Sourdin;Adelaide Law Review,2020
3. Jackson, R (2009) Review of Civil Litigation Costs: Preliminary Report. TSO.
4. How can the process of medical litigation be improved for all parties: Lessons from experience?;McKeever;Medico-Legal Journal of Ireland,2021
5. Bargaining in the dark: The normative incoherence of lawyer dispute bargaining role;Condlin;Maryland Law Review,1992