Abstract
AbstractSince the spark of the Egyptian revolution in January 2011, issues of political party law reform, constitutional declarations, and the institution of free and fair elections have taken the lead in mainstream politics, and at times, relegated the role of organised labour to mere economistic agitation and disruption of an already ‘disrupted’ life, in the eyes of the Egyptian public. In contrast to mainstream depiction of the labour movement as a ‘single issue’ movement, this paper shows the decisive political role of labour struggles that took place both inside and outside the judicial and legal systems, in the years leading up to the events of 25 January. This paper identifies the diversity of tactics used by the labour movement, and its unique approach to legality – a defensive legality approach, where legality and illegality are both taken seriously as legitimate tactics of resistance. The defensive legality approach recognises the violence and coerciveness of the legal form, as well as the tactical potential of recourse to the legal system to defend the labour movement. The experience of Egyptian workers in the wake of the 25 January revolution reveals the politics and the limits of law, as well as the significance of tactically and defensively using the law.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference57 articles.
1. The Parallel Worlds of Corporate Governance and Labor Law
2. Luxemburg on Tahrir Sqaure: Reading the Arab Revolutions with Rosa Luxemburg's The Mass Strike;Zemni;Antipode,2012
3. THE MORAL ECONOMY OF THE ENGLISH CROWD IN THE EIGHTEENTH CENTURY
4. Stigset Marianne and Sulugiuc Gelu (2011) ‘Suez Canal, Carrying 8% of Trade, Open Amid Unrest’ Bloomberg, online: (last accessed 9 July 2012).
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Workers and Change in China;CAMB STUD CONTENT;2021-01-14
2. Recovering from conflict and uncertainty post Arab Spring;International Journal of Conflict Management;2017-04-10