The FinTech Revolution and Financial Regulation: The Case of Online Supply-Chain Financing

Author:

TSAI Chang-hsien,PENG Kuan-Jung

Abstract

AbstractOnline supply-chain financing has been a relatively novel funding channel for suppliers as small- and medium-sized enterprises (“SMEs”) to obtain loans in that the revolution of financial technology (“FinTech”) transforms traditional supply-chain financing, which used to be administered only by official banks, to an online model also used by electronic commerce platforms (“e-commerce platform”). Endeavours towards financial inclusion of the underserved SMEs could rationalize why we should allow for or encourage FinTech innovations exemplified by the online supply-chain financing mentioned above. What would be an adaptive regulatory regime for such innovative FinTech-enabled financial services as the online supply-chain financing? Within our conceptual framework to regulate the FinTech industry at the early stage, rather than rigorous rules traditionally placed on large financial institutions, a principles-based strategy should be adopted to strike a balance between financial stability and access to financial services advanced by disruptive innovations. As a necessary complement, regulatory sandboxes would be needed to spur a shift in institutional philosophy to a principles-based regulatory regime. In other words, the regulatory attitude of FinTech regulation should be humble and light-touch to promote innovation for improving digital financial inclusion, albeit on the premise of containing potential systemic risk and protecting consumer interest in the meantime.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Law,Sociology and Political Science

Reference51 articles.

1. 1. Arner Douglas W., Barberis Janos Nathan, & Buckley Ross P. (2015) "The Evolution of FinTech: A New Post-Crisis Paradigm?," University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2015/047

2. 2. UNSW Law Research Paper No. 2016-62, online (last accessed 8 October 2016).

3. MoneySuperMarket.com (2016) “Peer-to-peer Business Loans Explained,” online (last accessed 10 October 2016).

4. Fenwick Mark , Kaal Wulf A. , & Vermeulen Erik P.M. (2016) “Regulation Tomorrow: What Happens when Technology Is Faster than the Law?,” Lex Research Topics in Corporate Law & Economics Working Paper No. 2016–8; U of St. Thomas (Minnesota) Legal Studies Research Paper No. 16–23; TILEC Discussion Paper No. 2016–024, online (last accessed 18 October 2016).

5. The Behavioral Paradox: Why Investor Irrationality Calls for Lighter and Simpler Financial Regulation;Juurikkala;Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law,2012

Cited by 64 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3