Abstract
This paper argues that there is no reason to believe that full NP Object Shift (NPOS) was not found in Old Norse (Old Icelandic) nor that it is more common in Modern Icelandic than in earlier stages of the language. In addition, it is claimed that NPOS is also an option in Modern Faroese, contrary to common belief, although it is much more restricted in Faroese than in Icelandic. These results demonstrate the usefulness of systematic corpus studies while at the same time reminding us of their limits. In addition, they shed a new light on the status of Faroese among the Scandinavian languages and on the nature of intra-speaker variation and grammar competition.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Reference47 articles.
1. The syntax and semantics of Object Shift;Diesing;Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax,1993
2. Remarks on Holmberg’s Generalization
3. Distributing arguments
4. Angantýsson Ásgrímur . 2011. The Syntax of Embedded Clauses in Icelandic and Related Languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Iceland.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Optimal Linking Grammar;CAMB STUD LINGUIST;2023-04-20
2. Transitive expletive constructions in Swedish;Nordic Journal of Linguistics;2017-11-29
3. Object Shift in Scandinavian;The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition;2017-11-24
4. On quantity and quality in syntactic variation studies;Syntactic Variation in Insular Scandinavian;2017-07-18
5. Object shift in Scandinavian languages: The impact of contrasted elements;Nordic Journal of Linguistics;2013-09-13