Abstract
In 1971, Joan Robinson entered into a debate with the
American neoclassical economist C.E. Ferguson in the Canadian
Journal of Economics over the efficacy of the
neoclassical theory of capital in light of the Cambridge Controversies
raging at the time. Recent archival evidence from the Martin Bronfenbrenner
Papers at Duke Archive has uncovered a heretofore lost reply Ferguson wrote
to Robinson on or around September 1971, three months before his death. That
reply is published for the first time as an Appendix to this article.
Uncovering this reply, as well as correspondence between Ferguson,
Bronfenbrenner, and Solow, shines a light into the American neoclassical
camp of the late 1960s and early 1970s as the early phase in the Cambridge
Controversies was drawing to a close.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
History and Philosophy of Science,General Economics, Econometrics and Finance,General Arts and Humanities
Reference72 articles.
1. The Current State of Capital Theory: A Tale of Two Paradigms
2. Lazzarini Andrés . 2010. “A Looking-Glass of the Cambridge Capital Controversy: Notes on a Reconsideration of its Relevance.” Unpublished ms.
3. Brief Comments
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献