Abstract
ABSTRACTDiscussions of political obligation and authority have focused on the idea that the commands of genuine authorities constitute content-independent reasons. Despite its centrality in these debates, the notion of “content-independence” is unclear and controversial, with some claiming that it is incoherent, useless, or irrelevant. I clarify content-independence by focusing on how reasons can depend on features of their container. I then show how the fact that laws can constitute content-independent reasons is consistent with the fact that some laws must fail to bind due to their egregiously unjust content. Finally, I defend my understanding against challenges and show why it retains a place of special importance for questions about the law and political obligation. Content-independence highlights that it is some feature of the law or law-making process in general that is supposed to generate moral obligations for citizens, not the merits of particular laws.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
17 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Conclusion;Morality and Socially Constructed Norms;2023-10-26
2. Explaining the Wrong of Sovereignty Violations;Morality and Socially Constructed Norms;2023-10-26
3. Grounding Political Obligation;Morality and Socially Constructed Norms;2023-10-26
4. Grounding Moral Rights;Morality and Socially Constructed Norms;2023-10-26
5. The Agency-Respect View;Morality and Socially Constructed Norms;2023-10-26