Author:
Links Jonathan M.,Schwartz Brian S.,Lin Sen,Kanarek Norma,Mitrani-Reiser Judith,Sell Tara Kirk,Watson Crystal R.,Ward Doug,Slemp Cathy,Burhans Robert,Gill Kimberly,Igusa Tak,Zhao Xilei,Aguirre Benigno,Trainor Joseph,Nigg Joanne,Inglesby Thomas,Carbone Eric,Kendra James M.
Abstract
AbstractObjectivePolicy-makers and practitioners have a need to assess community resilience in disasters. Prior efforts conflated resilience with community functioning, combined resistance and recovery (the components of resilience), and relied on a static model for what is inherently a dynamic process. We sought to develop linked conceptual and computational models of community functioning and resilience after a disaster.MethodsWe developed a system dynamics computational model that predicts community functioning after a disaster. The computational model outputted the time course of community functioning before, during, and after a disaster, which was used to calculate resistance, recovery, and resilience for all US counties.ResultsThe conceptual model explicitly separated resilience from community functioning and identified all key components for each, which were translated into a system dynamics computational model with connections and feedbacks. The components were represented by publicly available measures at the county level. Baseline community functioning, resistance, recovery, and resilience evidenced a range of values and geographic clustering, consistent with hypotheses based on the disaster literature.ConclusionsThe work is transparent, motivates ongoing refinements, and identifies areas for improved measurements. After validation, such a model can be used to identify effective investments to enhance community resilience. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2018;12:127–137)
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
Cited by
84 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献