Author:
Arato Julian,Claussen Kathleen,Heath J. Benton
Abstract
AbstractIn response to the pandemic, most states have enacted special measures to protect national economies and public health. Many of these measures would likely violate trade and investment disciplines unless they qualify for one of several exceptions. This Essay examines the structural implications of widespread anticipated defenses premised on the idea of “exceptionalism.” It argues that the pandemic reveals the structural weakness of the exceptions-oriented paradigm of justification in international economic law.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference9 articles.
1. The Margin of Appreciation in International Investment Law;Arato;Va. J. Int'l L.,2014
2. Rebalancing Through Exceptions;Vandevelde;Lewis and Clark L. Rev,2013
3. The World Trade Organization 20 Years On: Global Governance by Judiciary
4. Trade Law and Supply Chain Regulation in a Post-COVID World;Meyer;AJIL,2020
5. Treaty and Contract in Investment Arbitration;Crawford;Arb. Int'l,2008
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献