Author:
Hammersley J. M.,Morton K. W.
Abstract
As we have stressed in a previous paper (9), the main concern in Monte Carlo work is to achieve without inordinate labour a respectably small standard error in the final result. Mere replication of the Monte Carlo results is unrewarding; for, to reduce a standard error by a factor k, the labour must be increased k2-fold, and this will be beyond the resources of even electronic computers when k = 1000, say. The remedy lies in a skilful choice of sampling technique and the substitution of analytical methods for random processes wherever possible. The efficiency of a Monte Carlo process may be taken as inversely proportional to the product of the sampling variance of the final estimate and the amount of labour expended in obtaining this estimate; and it is profitable to allow some increase in the labour if that produces an overwhelming decrease in the variance. For instance, in the last example quoted below (Table 2), we reduce the variance by a factor of four million at the expense of only multiplying the labour sixteenfold, thereby attaining a 250,000-fold gain of efficiency.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference9 articles.
1. SAMPLING WITH CONTROL VARIABLES
2. On an experimental determination of π;Hall;Messeng. Math,1873
3. Lagrangian Integration Coefficients for Distance Functions Taken Over Right Circular Cylinders
4. (7) Hammersley J. M. The absorption of radioactive radiation in rods. (National Bureau of Standards' unpublished working paper no. 1929, 1952.)
Cited by
191 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献