Abstract
The intuition behind the notion of a cycle-free partial order (CFPO) is that it should be a partial ordering (X, ≤ ) in which for any sequence of points (x0, x1;…, xn–1) with n ≤ 4 such that xi is comparable with xi+1 for each i (indices taken modulo n) there are i and j with j ╪ i, i + 1 such that xj lies between xi and xi+1. As its turn out however this fails to capture the intended class, and a more involved definition, in terms of the ‘Dedekind–MacNeille completion’ of X was given by Warren[5]. An alternative definition involving the idea of a betweenness relation was proposed by P. M. Neumann [1]. It is the purpose of this paper to clarify the connections between these definitions, and indeed between the ideas of semi-linear order (or ‘tree’), CFPO, and the betweenness relations described in [1]. In addition I shall tackle the issue of the axiomatizability of the class of CFPOs.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference5 articles.
1. Partially ordered sets
2. [1] Adeleke S. A. and Neumann P. M. . Relations related to betweenness: their structure and automorphisms, in preparation.
3. [5] Warben R. . The structure of k-CS-transitive cycle-free partial orders, to appear in the Memoirs of the American Math. Soc.
4. The Reconstruction of Trees from Their Automorphism Groups
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. On setwise betweenness;Applied General Topology;2023-04-05
2. On limits of betweenness relations;Journal of Group Theory;2023-03-15
3. Betweenness Relations in a Categorical Setting;Results in Mathematics;2017-03-23
4. The axiomatics of ordered geometry;Expositiones Mathematicae;2011
5. k-CS-transitive infinite graphs;Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B;2009-03