Abstract
The Parseval formulae for Fourier cosine and sine transforms,are of course most widely known in connexion with the classical theorems of Plancherel on functions of the class L2 (whose transforms are defined by mean convergence), and with their generalizations. We cannot expect to obtain anything as elegant as the ‘L2’ results when we consider (1) for functions of other kinds. Nevertheless, since the most obvious way of defining Fourier transforms is by means of Lebesgue or Cauchy integrals, we naturally wish to know how far the formulae (1) hold good for transforms obtained in this way. The two most familiar classes of functions having such transforms are:(i) functions f(t) integrable in the Lebesgue sense in (0, ∞), whose transforms Fe(x) and Fs(x) are defined by the Lebesgue integrals respectively; and(ii) functions f(t) which decrease in (0, ∞), tend to zero as t → ∞, and are integrable over any finite interval (0, T); in this case the transforms are defined by the Cauchy integrals .
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Cited by
31 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. MORE ABOUT COMPLEX METHODS;Trigonometric Series;2003-02-06
2. CONVERGENCE AND SUMMABILITY ALMOST EVERYWHERE;Trigonometric Series;2003-02-06
3. INTERPOLATION OF LINEAR OPERATIONS. MORE ABOUT FOURIER COEFFICIENTS;Trigonometric Series;2003-02-06
4. TRIGONOMETRIC INTERPOLATION;Trigonometric Series;2003-02-06
5. CONTENTS;Trigonometric Series;2003-02-06