Abstract
In recent years, sovereign debt crises have received much attention from
the perspective of international public policy, but an effective legal
solution to sovereign defaults has yet to coalesce within international law.
Over the last two decades, private creditors have increasingly resorted to
litigation in national courts, though without great success, in an effort to
obtain payment on defaulted sovereign debt. Another, emerging option is
arbitration —in particular, before the International Centre for Settlement
of Investment Disputes (ICSID). Will ICSID be the new venue of choice for
recovering on sovereign bonds? The conclusion reached here is that attempts
to take defaulting countries to ICSID arbitration are unlikely to
succeed.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Law,Political Science and International Relations
Reference90 articles.
1. Two Worlds of Necessity in ICSID Arbitration: CMS vs. LG and
E;Michael;20 Leiden J. Int’l L,2007
2. Compensation and Damages in International Law;Irmgard;7 J. World Investment and Trade,2006
Cited by
19 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献