Author:
Czech Brian,Borkhataria Rena
Abstract
Species conservation via the Endangered Species Act is highly politicized, yet few data have been gathered to illustrate the relationship of political party affiliation to species conservation perspectives. We conducted a nationwide public opinion survey and found that Democrats value species conservation more highly than do Republicans, and that Democrats are also more strongly supportive of the Endangered Species Act. Republicans place higher value on property rights than do Democrats, but members of both parties value economic growth as highly as wildlife conservation. The results imply that the Democratic propensity to value species conservation reflects a biocentric perspective that does not bode well for practical conservation efforts. Species conservation will depend upon the success of academicians and progressive political leaders in educating students and members of all parties about the fundamental conflict between economic growth and wildlife conservation.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Public Administration,Social Sciences (miscellaneous),Sociology and Political Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Knowledge and the environment
2. Social Construction, Political Power, and the Allocation of Benefits to Endangered Species
3. Giesbrecht L.H. , Kulp D.W. , and Starer A.W. (1996). “Estimating Coverage Bias in RDD Samples with Current Population Survey (CPS) Data.” Paper presented at the 1996 American Association for Public Opinion Research Annual Conference and available from Marketing Systems Group, Fort Washington, Pennsylvania.
4. Estimating Telephone Noncoverage Bias With a Telephone Survey
Cited by
12 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献