RHETORIC OF THE STANDARDS: THE DEBATE OVER GOLD AND SILVER IN THE 1890s

Author:

Wells Wyatt

Abstract

AbstractIn the 1890s, questions about whether to base the American currency upon gold or silver dominated public discourse and eventually forced a realignment of the political parties. The matter often confuses modern observers, who have trouble understanding how such a technically complex—even arcane—issue could arouse such passions. The fact that no major nation currently backs its currency with precious metal creates the suspicion that the issue was a “red herring” that distracted from matters of far greater importance. Yet the rhetoric surrounding the “Battle of the Standards” indicates that the more sophisticated advocates of both sides understood that, in the financial context of the 1890s, the contest between gold and silver not only had important economic implications but would substantially affect the future development of the United States.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

History

Reference46 articles.

1. The Issue of 1896;Parsons;The Arena,1896

2. The Battle of the Standards in America: Suggestions for a Compromise;Dillon;The Nineteenth Century,1896

3. Has the Election Settled the Money Question?;Bryan;The North American Review,1896

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. The Goldbugs Go Global: The Philippines, China, and the Foundations of Development;The Journal of the Gilded Age and Progressive Era;2024-04-26

2. The McKinley Bowl’s Services and Disservices, 1898–1901;American Art;2023-06-01

3. De Cecco on Financial Centres, Monetary Power and Crisis;Review of Political Economy;2022-07-28

4. Populism and the Populists: The Incoherent Coherence of Coxey's March;American Journal of Economics and Sociology;2019-05

5. Congress as a Handler of Challenges: The Historical Record;Studies in American Political Development;2015-09-07

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3