Abstract
AbstractIs it appropriate to honor artists who have created great works but who have also acted immorally? In this article, after arguing that honoring involves identifying a person as someone we ought to admire, we present three moral reasons against honoring immoral artists. First, we argue that honoring can serve to condone their behavior, through the mediums of emotional prioritization and exemplar identification. Second, we argue that honoring immoral artists can generate undue epistemic credibility for the artists, which can lead to an indirect form of testimonial injustice for the artists’ victims. Third, we argue, building on the first two reasons, that honoring immoral artists can also serve to silence their victims. We end by considering how we might respond to these reasons.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference63 articles.
1. Weinstein Harvey . (2009) ‘Polanski Has Served His Time and Must Be Freed’ (blog). Independent. September 28, 2009. http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/harvey-weinstein-polanski-has-served-his-time-and-must-be-freed-1794699.html.
2. Linking admiration and adoration to self-expansion: Different ways to enhance one's potential
3. Mumford Gwilym . (2017) ‘Roman Polanski Accused of Sexually Assaulting 10-Year-Old Girl in 1975’. Guardian. November 23, 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/film/2017/oct/23/roman-polanski-marianne-barnard-allegations.
4. Emotion
5. Levenson Eric , and Aaron Cooper . (2018) ‘Bill Cosby Sentenced to 3 to 10 Years in Prison for Sexual Assault’. CNN . September 26, 2018. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/09/25/us/bill-cosby-sentence-assault/index.html.
Cited by
30 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献