Abstract
ABSTRACTPreservation of digital data is predicated on the expectation of its reuse, yet that expectation has never been examined within archaeology. While we have extensive digital archives equipped to share data, evidence of reuse seems paradoxically limited. Most archaeological discussions have focused on data management and preservation and on disciplinary practices surrounding archiving and sharing data. This article addresses the reuse side of the data equation through a series of linked questions: What is the evidence for reuse, what constitutes reuse, what are the motivations for reuse, and what makes some data more suitable for reuse than others? It concludes by posing a series of questions aimed at better understanding our digital engagement with archaeological data.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Reference71 articles.
1. How Archaeological Evidence Bites Back: Strategies for Putting Old Data to Work in New Ways;Wylie;Science, Technology, and Human Values,2017
2. The FAIR Guiding Principles for Scientific Data Management and Stewardship;Wilkinson;Scientific Data,2016
3. If We Share Data, Will Anyone Use Them? Data Sharing and Reuse in the Long Tail of Science and Technology
4. Sasse Tom , Amanda Smith , Ellen Broad , Jeni Tennison , Peter Wells , and Ulrich Atz 2017 Recommendations for Open Data Portals: From Setup to Sustainability. Electronic document, https://www.europeandataportal.eu/sites/default/files/edp_s3wp4_sustainability_recommendations.pdf, accessed August 9, 2017.
Cited by
38 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献