Author:
SHILOFF J. DEBORAH,MAGWOOD BRYAN,MALISZA KRISZTINA L.
Abstract
The process of research is often lengthy and can be extremely arduous. It may take many years to proceed from the initial development of an idea through to the comparison of the new modalities against a current gold-standard practice. Each step along the way involves rigorous scientific review, where protocols are scrutinized by multiple scientists not only in the specific field at hand but related fields as well. In addition to scientific review, most countries require a further review by a panel that will specifically address the ethics of the proposed research. In Canada, those panels are referred to as Research Ethics Boards (REB), with the United States counterparts known as Institutional Review Boards (IRB).
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health(social science)
Reference61 articles.
1. Formative evaluation using checklists to improve research proposals;Emery;Perspectives in Health Information Management,2006
2. The checklist—a tool for error management and performance improvement
3. Federal regulation of REB review of clinical trials: A modest but easy step towards an accountable REB review structure in Canada;Lemmens;Health Law Review,2005
4. A Step Toward Truly Protecting Human Subjects: Reviewing the Review Boards
5. How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献