Abstract
AbstractOne of the criteria used by many transplant centers in assessing psychosocial eligibility for solid organ transplantation is social support. Yet, social support is a highly controversial requirement that has generated ongoing debate between ethicists and clinicians who favor its consideration (i.e., utility maximizers) and those who object to its use on equity grounds (i.e., equity maximizers). The assumption underlying both of these approaches is that social support is not a commodity that can be purchased in the marketplace. This essay argues for the reconceptualization of social support as a product that can—and should—be purchased for transplant candidates to render them eligible for transplant.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Reference26 articles.
1. Fulfilling the Olmstead decision’s right to home-based care in 2022: Paying spousal caregivers;Bounds;Iowa Law Review,2022
2. The roles of social support and psychological distress in lung transplant candidacy;Phillips;Progress in Transplantation,2011
3. Buying and selling friendship;Taylor;American Philosophical Quarterly,2019
4. Beyond scarcity: Poverty as a contraindication for organ transplantation;Simmerling;Virtual Mentor,2007
5. Should lack of social support prevent access to organ transplantation?;Berry;American Journal of Bioethics,2019