Women's Right to Choose Rationally: Genetic Information,
Embryo Selection, and Genetic Manipulation
-
Published:2003-08-07
Issue:4
Volume:12
Page:418-428
-
ISSN:0963-1801
-
Container-title:Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Camb Q Healthc Ethics
Abstract
Margaret Brazier has argued that, in the literature on reproductive
technology, women's “right” to reproduce is
privileged, pushed, and subordinated to patriarchal values in such a
way that it amounts to women's old “duty” to
reproduce, dressed up in modern guise. I agree that there
are patriarchal assumptions made in discussions of whether women have a
right to select which embryos to implant or which fetuses to carry to
term. Forcing ourselves to see women as active, rational decisionmakers
tends to counteract any lingering patriarchal assumptions. But rational
decisionmaking requires information. Voting wisely requires information
about the candidates. Taking women's reproductive rights seriously
means taking seriously women's need for relevant information to
make rational decisions, including decisions about which embryos to
implant or alter. I argue that preimplantation genetic profiles and
prenatal test information should be made available to prospective
parents, especially prospective mothers, unless doing so threatens to
harm the resulting child or the larger society in specifiable and
important ways.
Publisher
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Subject
Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献