Neuroethics, Painience, and Neurocentric Criteria for the Moral Treatment of Animals

Author:

LOVELESS SHERRY E.,GIORDANO JAMES

Abstract

Abstract:Neuroscience affords knowledge that can be leveraged in the ontological valuation of individuals, groups, and species. Sociocultural sentiments, norms, and mores may impede embracing such knowledge to revise moral attitudes, ethics, and policies. We argue that the practices of neuroethics will be valuable in that they ground ethico-legal discourse in (1) naturalistic philosophy; (2) the current epistemological capital of neuroscience; (3) the issues, problems, and solutions arising in and from neuroscientific research and its applications; and 4) the use of neurocentric criteria—such as painience—to define and resolve ethical decisions regarding attitudes toward and treatment of nonhuman animals.

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Health Policy,Issues, ethics and legal aspects,Health (social science)

Reference73 articles.

1. Lascelles BDX , Flecknell PA . Do animal models tell us about human pain? Pain: Clinical Updates 2010;XVIII(5):1–5; available at http://www.iasp-pain.org/AM/AMTemplate.cfm?Section=HOME,HOME&TEMPLATE=/CM/ContentDisplay.cfm&CONTENTID=15073&SECTION=HOME,HOME (last accessed 20 June 2012).

2. Animal models and the prediction of efficacy in clinical trials of analgesic drugs: A critical appraisal and call for uniform reporting standards

3. Do insects feel pain? — A biological view

4. Is the use of sentient animals in basic research justifiable?

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Do You Mind? Toward Neurocentric Criteria for Assessing Cognitive Function Relevant to the Moral Regard and Treatment of Non-Human Organisms;AJOB Neuroscience;2023-04-03

2. One Health Requires a Theory of Agency;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;2022-10

3. Brains in Society: Of the People, for the People, and by the People?;Studies in Brain and Mind;2022

4. If It Only Had a Brain: What “Neuro” Means for Science and Ethics;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;2018-09-10

5. Do Chimeras Have Minds?;Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics;2017-09-22

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3