Use of antimicrobials in the treatment of calf diarrhea: a systematic review

Author:

Bernal-Córdoba C.,Branco-Lopes R.,Latorre-Segura L.,de Barros-Abreu M.,Fausak E. D.,Silva-del-Río N.ORCID

Abstract

AbstractThe objective of this study was to conduct a systematic review of the scientific literature evaluating the efficacy and comparative efficacy of antimicrobials (AMs) for the treatment of diarrhea in calves. Eligible studies were non- and randomized controlled trials evaluating an AM intervention against a positive and negative control, with at least one of the following outcomes: fecal consistency score, fever, dehydration, appetite, attitude, weight gain, and mortality. Four electronic databases were searched. Titles and abstracts (three reviewers) and full texts (two reviewers) were screened. A total of 2899 studies were retrieved; 11 studies met the inclusion criteria. The risk of bias was assessed. Most studies had incomplete reporting of trial design and results. Eight studies compared AMs to a negative control (placebo or no treatment). Among eligible studies, the most common outcomes reported were diarrhea severity (n= 6) and mortality (n= 6). Eligible studies evaluated very different interventions and outcomes; thus, a meta-analysis was not performed. The risk of bias assessment revealed concerns with reporting of key trial features, including disease and outcome definitions. Insufficient evidence is available in the scientific literature to assess the efficacy of AMs in treating calf diarrhea.

Funder

California Department of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

Cambridge University Press (CUP)

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology

Reference56 articles.

1. Food and Drug Administration – FDA (2021) Extralabel Use and Antimicrobials. Available at https://www.fda.gov/animal-veterinary/antimicrobial-resistance/extralabel-use-and-antimicrobials (Accessed 21 March 2021).

2. The REFLECT Statement: Methods and Processes of Creating Reporting Guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials for Livestock and Food Safety

3. A review of morbidity and mortality rates and disease occurrence in North American feedlot cattle;Kelly;The Canadian Veterinary Journal,1986

4. Comparison of efficacy of sulbactam:ampicillin to ampicillin and saline for treatment of experimentally induced Escherichia coli diarrhea in neonatal calves;Lofstedt;Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research,1996

5. Meta-analysis of treatment of cattle with bovine respiratory disease with tulathromycin

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3